The Banning of Yoga by Rev Simon Farrar is more of the personal issue not to be advertised so characteristically. I appreciate this move of banning the yoga reasons. And its that if Ms Lousy Woodcock is teaching some thing like yoga or may be yoga then she must find a room or place separately rather then creating unnecessary controversy over the rejection.
1. The Churches are meant for their own activity not to be allowed to display your own hobbies to be expanded may it be Yoga or any other non- religious activity.
2 . Would any one let any body eat the vegetarian food in the any of the premises of worship I am talking where the God, Goddess, or any other sanctity is placed. Eating food is non-religious activity. Many will tell you it is not spiritual to eat food in premises of worship.
And not to say if Rev. Farrar has given a label of Hinduism to Yoga then it is the fault of Yoga representatives that have promoted the yoga in the way.
Similarly church is the premises of Christian faith and the Church head has full authority to apply the rights of worship, premises sanctity to any of the activity, may it be a simple communication however non-religious it may seem. See if Rev Simon has an objection that is local not an international issue and he is free to let use his church premises in any way he proposes according to the Christian faith and I find he needs no explanation to do this.
